The project

Imagine we could travel back in time to visit Greece in the mid 2nd century AD. We would find a country that had already been part of the Roman Empire, for over two hundred years and was enjoying something of an urban renaissance. The famous cities, or poleis, of old Greece – Athens, Sparta, Corinth and the rest – might have lost their independence but their city centres had never before looked so splendid. Partly thanks to imperial benefactions by philhellene emperors such as Hadrian they were full of grand new buildings. If we were to walk around one of these cities we would be struck by the large number of statues and other monuments standing in public spaces. The agora (market place), theatre, streets, bathhouses and gymnasia would all be cluttered with statues made of bronze and stone – statues of gods, heroes, emperors, local politicians and benefactors, athletes and even animals. There would also probably be several large public tombs. Some of these monuments would already be hundreds of years old, many of them would have been erected much more recently.

The only places where we might see such concentrations of monuments today are museums, or museum-like spaces such as old cathedrals. Perhaps unsurprisingly a lot of people have talked of Greek cities becoming like museums under Roman rule. This reinforces a once popular view that the culture of the Greek cities declined and stagnated once they became part of the Empire. It implies that the past had become more important than the present in the lives of these cities, that the display of statues was more important than day-to-day life.

Nowadays more and more scholars have begun to question the idea of Roman period decline and are recognising that at the time of the Empire the Greek polis enjoyed a lively and dynamic culture and a remarkably high level of popular involvement in local politics. The Greek city in the Roman period wasn’t a museum. The public spaces where monuments stood were still home to the hustle and bustle of daily life – the business of buying and selling, political meetings, sport, religion and meeting with friends. In my PhD thesis I made this argument for the Roman period agora. As in most Mediterranean cultures, particularly in pre-Industrial times, the Roman period Greeks spent a good deal of their time outside in public spaces. I believe that thinking about what it must have been like to spend so much time surrounded by so many monuments brings us to the heart of what made life in these cities so different from our modern urban experience. I am fascinated by thinking about the impact that statues, tombs and inscriptions must have had on the people who moved among them and want to understand the role that monuments played in shaping the society and culture of the Roman period Greek polis.

My research project as a Marie Curie Fellow at the Faculty of Classics at the University of Oxford will combine archaeological, literary and epigraphic (from inscriptions) evidence to investigate these issues. My central concern is to investigate the various ways in which the setting of public monuments worked to give them meaning – how they were positioned in relation to other monuments, what types of activity were going on around them, how visible they were and what type of audience might they have had. This will allow me to explore how monuments were used to reinforce or challenge positions of power in the local community and how the meaning of monuments that might on first consideration seem very different, for example sacred and civic, might have overlapped.

I’ve started this blog in order to offer some insight into my project as it progresses and hopefully to encourage people to respond to and discuss my ideas. I’ll be posting on aspects of my research such as articles I’m working on or particularly interesting pieces of evidence I come across as well as on other topics relating to Ancient History and Classical Archaeology that I happen to find interesting. I’ll also be posting on topics relating to my work as a researcher at the University of Oxford. I’ve only been here two weeks and am still finding my way around but so far it is a very exciting place to be.

I would greatly appreciate feedback so if there is something you find particularly interesting and have a question about, something you happen to disagree with or any ideas you might have on my research then please do leave a comment and I’ll get back to you.

You can read my latest posts, recent first, here

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “The project

    1. Thanks for your comment and sorry for taking a while to get back to you. That is a very good question. I think that the answer is definitely yes, status would have been important for how people viewed these different monuments. Most of the portrait statues would have been of elite individuals so members of that class were likely to feel differently about them than the rest of the population who could never expect to be awarded such a monument. One of the key issues that I want to explore in the project is precisely how monuments were used at the local level to determine relations of power between different groups such as elite/non-elite. This isn’t an easy question to answer because all of our ancient written sources are from elite authors so their is much more evidence for the elite perspective. Even in these writings, however, we sometimes see glimpses of non-elite attitudes to monuments which can be useful. Thinking more about the archaeological evidence and where things stood and who would have seen them can, I believe, take us a step further in answering these kinds of questions.

      Like

  1. Great project, I’ll follow your work with attention. I’m very interested in this topic as I made my Master’s thesis on the religious syncretism in the city of Corinth from 146 BC to 267 AD.

    Like

      1. I’m very enthusiastic! I’m very eager to read your articles! The one about the Tower of the Winds was really nice!

        I hope you’ll talk about the religious/social meanings of the water network which is very interesting in Corinth (famous Peirene and Glauke fountains).

        There is also a peculiar statue base on which the name of the seven hills of Rome are written. This is the only case of this kind and it must have an important meaning, even if it was somewhat neglected by scholars. Why does this monument take place in the corinthian forum? Maybe you could bring some light on that!

        Looking forward to reading you again!

        Like

      2. Thank you very much. I’m not sure I’ll pay to much attention to Peirene and Glauke in my research because I’m more interested in smaller monuments like statues and public tombs. There were some statues in the Peirene courtyard and in the vicinity of Glauke though so as settings for smaller monuments I’m sure I’ll dealing with them. You must know Betsey Robinson’s excellent work on the meaning of the fountains themselves. Maybe I will say something about them in a blog at some point. They are fascinating monuments.

        I am aware of the Seven Hills of Rome monument at Corinth and you’re right it is very intriguing. I’m sure I’ll look into that a bit more at some point but can’t promise I’ll be able to say anything new about it. We’ll see….

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s